- THE PLAYBOOK
- Posts
- Why You Sound Like Everyone Else on LinkedIn
Why You Sound Like Everyone Else on LinkedIn
The 80/20 that's flipped, and why proprietary inputs beat better prompts every time
Most LinkedIn content is lazy, generic, and forgettable. AI just made it worse.
Everyone's pulling from the same recycled inputs, so everyone sounds identical. Founders included.
Peter Caputa doesn't. 37,800 followers, $10M ARR, and the kind of cult audience most founders would kill for.
This newsletter is brought to you by Jason AI.
Jason AI is a conversational AI tool focused on enhancing B2B sales processes. It acts as a personal assistant to sales teams by automating outreach sequences, handling responses from prospects, and booking meetings.
His whole edge comes down to one thing almost nobody's willing to build...
INSIGHT 1: The stack is generic. The data feeding it is proprietary.
Peter's setup follows a simple 5-stage process.
Tools underpinning the setup:
- Avoma MCP for sales calls
- Slack MCP for team and client chatter
- Databox - MCP for the performance of every post he's written
Most founder content is pulling from "what Claude thinks a good post sounds like" and missing the lived experience that makes you stand out.
Peter's point: the only true differentiation in the content he builds is through his inputs.
That's the reason you'll never be able to copy him. Because his inputs are unique. At any second, he can pull in real stories from customers on Slack.
Real data on what's working with clients from Databox. And REAL day-to-day convo of running his business.
How I'm applying:
Fathom MCP is already the biggest feeder of my content. After that convo, I plugged in my Slack and set up a weekly task in Claude Cowork that pulls together what's happening in the agency.
INSIGHT 2: The 80/20 has flipped.
Peter's take outlines a change going on in B2B founder branding... the most effective brands are no longer the best creators... you've got to become the curator.
Because 80% of content time is collecting source material, 20% is writing.
The win goes to whoever captures the most original input and packages it in a way that builds distribution.
How I'm applying:
My Tuesday writing block doesn't start with a blank page anymore. It starts with whatever's been pulled from Slack, Fathom, and Claude Cowork in the previous six days. The writing is the last 20%.
INSIGHT 3: The CEO of a measurement company doesn't track his LinkedIn funnel.
Peter admitted it on the call: "I probably don't have good answers to your questions. I don't really attribute much of anything. I just know LinkedIn works."
He measures it through calls he ends up on, partner deals that close, DM threads that convert. Not once did he mention: "I know x amount of impressions leads to a lead."
How I'm applying:
The real signal on LinkedIn in 2026 lives downstream of the post. I get so caught up on metrics that I find myself rinsing old topics I know drive pipeline.
The real gold comes from paying attention to what content is actually starting conversations.
Just because you're not going viral. Does not mean your content efforts are failing.
If your content feels hollow, the data going in is the problem.
Had a similar a-ha? Do this:
- Connect your Fathom, Slack, and Notion to your Claude
- Spend the time on capturing source
- Share your lived experience
Do that, and you'll sit in a category of one.